Fix typos
This commit is contained in:
parent
36f5bb514c
commit
817d144b9e
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ a double round robin followed by a double eliminator with the top 4 teams to dec
|
|||||||
**Group Stage**
|
**Group Stage**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Group Stage is used to seed the teams. A round robin format is when each team plays against every other team. This is pretty good. If
|
Group Stage is used to seed the teams. A round robin format is when each team plays against every other team. This is pretty good. If
|
||||||
there are less number of teams, the fixture could include a double roun robin instead, where each team plays against every other team
|
there are less number of teams, the fixture could include a double round robin instead, where each team plays against every other team
|
||||||
twice.
|
twice.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Let us assume that there are a total of 8 teams in the tournament.
|
Let us assume that there are a total of 8 teams in the tournament.
|
||||||
@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ To make it fairer to the top performing teams, we could pit the top team against
|
|||||||
second-last team. It is likely that the first two teams are going to go to the finals based on what we might have already seen in the
|
second-last team. It is likely that the first two teams are going to go to the finals based on what we might have already seen in the
|
||||||
double round robin group stage. But hey... there could be "upsets".
|
double round robin group stage. But hey... there could be "upsets".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A better alternative for playoffs follows..
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Consider this setup for the top 4 seeded teams.
|
Consider this setup for the top 4 seeded teams.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Game 1: Team 1 plays against Team 2.
|
- Game 1: Team 1 plays against Team 2.
|
||||||
@ -61,7 +63,7 @@ But most importantly, we now have mitigated the possibility of upsets!
|
|||||||
> Note that to run a double-eliminator, one needs a number of teams that can be expressed as an exponent of 2 - 4, 8, 16 and so on.
|
> Note that to run a double-eliminator, one needs a number of teams that can be expressed as an exponent of 2 - 4, 8, 16 and so on.
|
||||||
Each game generates a winner and a loser who plays subsequently, or generates a winner and eliminates the other team. At the end of
|
Each game generates a winner and a loser who plays subsequently, or generates a winner and eliminates the other team. At the end of
|
||||||
the round where only a winner is generated, we would need a corresponding winner from another game to pair up in the next round.
|
the round where only a winner is generated, we would need a corresponding winner from another game to pair up in the next round.
|
||||||
This is only possible halving the total number of teams after every such stage still leaves a number of teams that is divisible by 2.
|
This is only possible if halving the total number of teams after every such stage still leaves a number of teams that is divisible by 2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**What does IPL do?**
|
**What does IPL do?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -147,4 +149,4 @@ If required, we can throw in another game to identify the 3rd place in the playo
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
(The double eliminator for 8 teams with an optional 3rd place playoff is shown below).
|
(The double eliminator for 8 teams with an optional 3rd place playoff is shown below).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||

|

|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user