cool-mist/bbb
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add links

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
cool-mist 2022-10-29 16:50:32 +05:30
parent 10231e9343
commit e05b55e37f
2 changed files with 12 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
_posts/2022-09-05-securecommunication.markdown
View File

@ -9,6 +9,11 @@ to know what you said?
--------
This is part 2 of a series on communicating securely.
- [Part-1]({{site.base_url | absolute_url}}/securecommunication)
- [Part-2]({{site.base_url | absolute_url}}/reallysecure)
-------
The most secure method is to probably just meet in person, preferably in secret, and communicate verbally. While this may not be convenient all the time, this is definitely not practical if the sender and the receiver are not close by.
Long distance communication introduces a new party - the medium of communication. It could be

8
_posts/2022-09-08-reallysecure.markdown
View File

@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ How do we do that now? - For real! this time.
--------
This is part 2 of a series on communicating securely.
- [Part-1]({{site.base_url | absolute_url}}/securecommunication)
- [Part-2]({{site.base_url | absolute_url}}/reallysecure)
-------
Modern cryptography is indeed secure. However, malicious parties have anyway appeared on the scene under the guise of *Service Providers*.
# Who are these evil Service Providers?
@ -30,7 +36,7 @@ Some companies - such as Whatsapp - have promised end-to-end encryption of messa
# I'm not doing anything illegal, why should I be scared?
This is the most common argument against being afraid of companies and agencies (and even the government) collecting data. The argument of agencies snooping in on our messages is that of security a certain scope. Commercial companies can make a case for protecting you from malicious agents online. They can probably also defend it. Governmental agencies might make a similar argument with a defense terminating at national security. Civilians are expected to buy into these arguments (and some do) - resulting in a question along the lines of the title of this section.
This is the most common argument against being afraid of companies and agencies (and even the government) collecting data. The argument of agencies snooping in on our messages is that of security at a certain scope. Commercial companies can make a case for protecting you from malicious agents online. They can probably also defend such claims. Governmental agencies might make a similar argument with a defense terminating at national security. Civilians are expected to buy into these arguments (and some do) - resulting in a question along the lines of the title of this section.
## Problem of personal security